Recent Posts

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
11
Discussions; Public Archive / KT
« Last post by Dale Eastman on February 16, 2024, 04:53:06 PM »
Quote
laugh react
Quote
I got your message telling me what a stupid shit-head you are.
12
Discussions; Public Archive / SF
« Last post by Dale Eastman on February 12, 2024, 11:51:44 AM »
Quote from: 7 February 09:04
I suppose asking the question, "No shit?" to confirm this story... On the other hand, since this is a time leading to an election...


Quote from: 11 February 13:15
Dale Eastman, btw your "good candidate", albeit while not wearing a wig, is also shit because he is a UK citizen and can't be POTUS. However, I agree they are all shit. All politicians worldwide are granted parliamentary privilege (Americans incorrectly call it immunity), supposedly just for debate purposes inside the parliamentary house. However, this is extended outside of the debate house to everything so they can act as puppets and do dirty deeds done dirt cheap for the big-money elite. For example, Bush, UK PM Blair & AU PM Howard destroyed iRaQ and a million Iraqis based on the known lie of WMDs. Hence, when funded, I will go on a worldwide campaign for all political candidates to surrender parliamentary privilege. www.foi.today
[
Quote from: 11 February 13:15
SF, you and I are having a failure to communicate.





Dale Eastman, btw your "good candidate", albeit while not wearing a wig, is also shit because he is a UK citizen and can't be POTUS. However, I agree they are all shit. All politicians worldwide are granted parliamentary privilege (Americans incorrectly call it immunity), supposedly just for debate purposes inside the parliamentary house. However, this is extended outside of the debate house to everything so they can act as puppets and do dirty deeds done dirt cheap for the big-money elite. For example, Bush, UK PM Blair & AU PM Howard destroyed iRaQ and a million Iraqis based on the known lie of WMDs. Hence, when funded, I will go on a worldwide campaign for all political candidates to surrender parliamentary privilege. www.foi.today
13
Flouridation / 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation
« Last post by Dale Eastman on February 11, 2024, 11:14:58 AM »
14
Discussions; Public Archive / RJ
« Last post by Dale Eastman on February 07, 2024, 03:51:39 PM »
Quote from: 7 Feb 16:34
Dale Eastman Disobey our laws and find out! But then, you do have the right to choose your own time of death; unless they put you in a straitjacket or padded cell, that is!
Quote from: 7 Feb 16:44
our laws?
Quote from: 7 Feb 16:50
Please identify which of my words or post you are replying to with these words of yours:
Disobey our laws and find out! But then, you do have the right to choose your own time of death; unless they put you in a straitjacket or padded cell, that is!
Quote from: 7 Feb 16:55
DS That is right! Our laws, the laws this country control what you can do without being incarcerated ot shot dead. Nihilism is an excuse to do nothing and still bitch about everything!
Quote from: 7 Feb 17:03
Dale Eastman Not choosing to be controlled or who to be controlled does not mean you will not be controlled. Even the weather controls you. Choose what you will to make yourself comfortable. Not voting is a choice; but not being controlled good man, is not a choice. We are all controlled. Thoughts are free to an extent and admittedly, freedom is an attitude....but one that can be adjusted, like it or no!
Quote from: 7 Feb 17:16
I put a like on your reply... Because you did reply.

You added information of your thinking sufficient for me to assume, for the moment, that you and I have two contrary ideologies about living as a human, and living morally.

As I have posted many times: You are for liberty or you are for slavery. And as I wrote in an essay, this is NOT a false dichotomy.

You have stated "We are all controlled."

There are those who do attempt to control others. By what authority? I always have to define that when I ask by what authority, I specifically mean, By what Right-to-rule?
Quote from: 7 Feb 17:24
OMG, Did I ever misunderstand you. I took your statement as nhilistic; but I see you are against despotism. I couldn't agree more. I will NEVER attempt to control you; but wish you happy hunting: happy fishing...and a very happy uninslaved life!
[
Quote from: 7 Feb 17:37
I appreciate that a communication error was averted. I also erred in what I assumed about you because of how I interpreted your words.

This is all me:
https://synapticsparks.info/
16
Discussions; Public Archive / ID
« Last post by Dale Eastman on January 20, 2024, 04:32:28 PM »
Quote from: 17:43 18 August 2022
Hey IRS... You're part of government, right?
Quote
I DEMAND to know where the certified copies of my alleged consent,
with my signature on the consent form is being stored.

I DEMAND to know where the certified copies of the terms
 I allegedly agreed to are being stored.

I DEMAND proof of this alleged consent
to be governed, ruled, or owned

be presented IMMEDIATELY.

Failure to do so immediately is government's testimony,
and my evidence, that this alleged consent does not exist.

synapticsparks.info
Quote from: 16:32 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman when is consent needed for taxation?
Quote from: 2024 16:42 20 January
My apology. I do not know what your ideology is in regard to government and its enslavement. Sorry.
Quote from: 16:44 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman Proof of enslavement? Sorry, so many younglings misusing that word, I have to check and see if you're relying on feelings or facts
Quote from:  16:4520 January 2024
If you're in the territorial boundaries, they have jurisdiction to enforce their laws. Don't like it? Revolt
Quote from: 17:31 20 January 2024
Thank you for confirming what I only suspected.

Kudos that you actually asked an inquiry question:
"Proof of enslavement?"

I am going to answer your question with my own question to check if YOU are relying on feelings or facts, as well as determine if you wish to refuse to admit to the accuracy of this definition of slavery (enslavement).

The definition:
A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.

Admit or Deny?

I also have questions to clarify your claim about "jurisdiction"... Later.
Quote from: 17:35 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman I see you failed to cite your definition. So far, you seem to be relying on emotion. You're the only one being audited here.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/slavery
Do you fall under the defined description, citizen?
Quote from: 17:43 20 January 2024
I see you don't know how to read.

Those words you failed to read:

A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.

Admit or Deny?
Quote from: 17:45 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman I see you're projecting already. The reference is there for you to read/use.

Your subjective understanding is irrelevant. You may refer to facts/legal definitions.

Do you fall under the described conditions, citizen?
Quote from: 18:13 20 January 2024
Was your last reply an admission or a denial?
Quote from: 18:15 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman Your lack.of response can be taken as an inability to comprehend the term "slavery". Do you not fall under the described conditions?
Quote from: 19:12 20 January 2024
You asked these questions:
"Proof of enslavement?"
"Do you fall under the defined description?"
"Do you not fall under the described conditions?"

I asked you to Admit or Deny the definition I provided.
You have deliberately NOT addressed that definition I provided.
You  have deliberately concisely NOT Denied the provided definition.
This is an act of EQUIVOCATION: an ambiguous or deliberately evasive statement.
As I review your words I see you attempting to red herring the discussion away from my presented definition.

My presented definition addresses a specific trait, property, attribute, characteristic, element & condition of being a slave. A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.

You can NOT deny this.

Your dishonesty is going to end this discussion quite soon. I have had many interactions with others just as dishonest as you are proving yourself to be.

Note to self: Topic change regarding my suspicion regarding this person's ideology?
Quote from: 19:23 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman Mmm denied.

So you admit you aren't under enslavement, or facing any form of slavery.

At least you kinda tried?

Guess lying to yourself failed like all the others. Victim mongering seems to be a very inefficient means of getting sympathy, you won't find any here, citizen.

Guess you can't prove any alleged theft.
Quote from: 19:27 20 January 2024
https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1697.0
Quote from: 19:56 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman Is your consent at all needed or relevant for taxation?
Quote from: 07:20 20 January 2024
Are you aware of these words and where they come from:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed?

If you know these words then you know why my consent is needed.
Quote from: 13:33 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman Incorrect, your misinterpretations are moot.
Where in fine print does it state taxation requires consent?
Quote from: 14:03 20 January 2024
If a person is publicly posting their words they want to convey an opinion, a fact, an observation, a feeling, a belief, or even something a little more complex like an Ideology.

Or they just want to be an asshole troll for the purpose of annoying others.

Sometimes the intent is not immediately discernible.

At this time I do not know if you are trying to be a camouflaged subtle troll or if you have some other idea (ideology) you wish to present.

What is your purpose in replying to my post in the first place?

What do you actually want to make humans aware of?
Quote from: 14:48 20 January 2024
Dale Eastman You failed to show how consent is relevant or at all needed for taxation.
You're still ruled, and will continue to be ruled, without individual consent, as you voluntarily reside in a body politic with laws.

You're welcome for the clarification.
Quote from: Could not reblock for 48 hours. Fuck you ZuckerTurd
I saw your disrespectful laugh reacts. Your unwillingness to engage in respectful dialog means you're blocked you government school brainwashed stupid fuck.

=\
18
Discussions; Public Archive / My reply to a tax scammer.
« Last post by Dale Eastman on January 20, 2024, 02:10:59 PM »
The path to zero taxation LEGALLY is to read the actual words of the tax law.

What law imposes a liability for the taxes imposed in section 1 for a domestic worker's domestic compensation for labor.

Note to any other reader of this post. If taxstrategiesnow deletes this post without attempting to answer the question or reply intelligently to this post... Well you make up your own mind about the morality of taxstrategiesnow.

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid0PbGUUTfgdU5vtz4PwcgPFAXrfsaXfkxycB6R3NcdSLKfQHw8cU6GPnY8YC72GpsLl&id=100085071002930&comment_id=3599386160321503
19
Misc. / Example of such notice, if one existed:
« Last post by Dale Eastman on January 10, 2024, 03:03:55 PM »
It's important to let people know when they're trying to violate your rights. By giving them legal notice, you're telling them that you're aware of your rights and ready to take action to protect them. This creates a record of your intent to enforce your rights, which can be useful in any future legal proceedings. It also acts as a warning, making them think twice before continuing their actions. By giving legal notice, you can clearly state what rights are being violated and what you expect them to do to fix the situation. It's a proactive way to protect your rights and hopefully find a resolution without going to court.
- Example of such notice, if one existed:
Sample Notice for Covered Workers (W-4/W-2):
Dear Sir or Madam,
You have requested my signature on a Voluntary Withholding Agreement (W-4).
If you are seeking my signature to verify records that establish a nexus connecting me, under the authority of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), to assess, enforce, and collect taxes, I would like to inform you that the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution authorized Congress to impose an income tax. Congress implemented this through Title 26 of the United States Code, known as the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). The IRC, along with its implementing regulations, Treasury Department directives, orders, and decisions, may contain information that is responsive to your request.
Enclosed with this notice, you will find Treasury Decision 2313, TD 8734, and corresponding legal citations for your review.
I have also included evidence of the law that is responsive to your request.
I want to assure you that I am in full compliance with all the necessary rules and regulations applicable to me.
However, I am not authorized to sign the W-4 form.
Please be advised that any further attempts to demand my signature on the W-4 form, without proper verification on your part, may be considered unlawful and potentially criminal in nature. I strongly recommend that you consult your legal counsel before making any further requests regarding my signature on this form. Therefore, I must deny your request.
Kindly update your records to reflect this change in my status accordingly.
If you believe that this is an error, please provide specific evidence of the law that supports your claim, specifically related to me (insert name).
Please govern yourselves accordingly.
Legal Citations:
T.D. 8734, page 5.
These final regulations pertain to the withholding of income tax under sections 1441, 1442, and 1443 of the Code, specifically regarding certain U.S. source income paid to foreign persons, related tax deposit and reporting requirements, and related requirements governing the collection, refunds, and credits of withheld amounts.
"26 USC § 3401 – Definitions
(a) Wages
For purposes of this chapter, the term 'wages' means all remuneration... for services performed by an employee for his employer...
(c) Employee
For purposes of this chapter, the term 'employee' includes an officer, employee, or elected official of the United States, a state, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing.
USCFR26§31.3401(c)-1 Employee.
(a) The term 'employee' includes every individual performing services if the relationship between him and the person for whom he performs such services is the legal relationship of employer and employee. The term includes officers and employees, whether elected or appointed, of the United States, a State, Territory, Puerto Rico, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing.
(c) Generally, physicians, lawyers, dentists, veterinarians, contractors, subcontractors, public stenographers, auctioneers, and others who follow an independent trade, business, or profession, in which they offer their services to the public, are not employees.
'Individual': The term 'alien individual' means an individual who is not a citizen or a national of the United States. 26CFR1.1441-1(c)(3)(i)."
“[Treasury Decision 3980, Vol. 29, January-December, 1927, pgs. 64 and 65]
Brigham v. U.S., 160 F.3d 759 (1st Cir. 1998)
According to T.D. 8734, a 'U.S. Person' refers to an American citizen or domestic entity that is involved in or serving as the intermediary, flow-through entity, or a financial pipeline through which U.S. source income flows to its foreign destination.
I do not authorize anyone to make legal determinations on my behalf.
You are hereby put on NOTICE that this document must be filed as a permanent part of my record. If such record(s) have been deleted or substituted, this notice/demand still applies.
For more information, please refer to the following public domain educational material. Sources:
1. IRS Publication: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb97-44.pdf
2. Educational Video: https://rumble.com/v3v2umr-treasury-dept-says-payroll-withholding-is-only-for-foreigners-with-us-incom.html
Notary Sample - Jurat
State of _______
County of ____________
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared (________________),
known to me (or introduced to me by __________________________) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND and seal of office this _______ day of ______________, day of (_______).
___________________________________
Notary Public, State of _______ (Signature)
20
Guest Book / How to use this guest book
« Last post by Dale Eastman on January 09, 2024, 08:34:58 AM »
Click New Topic.
Compose your post.
Click Preview to proof read your post.
Make sure you have not made any typographical errors.
Once you click Post you can no longer see your post until an admin or another with approve post permissions approves your post.

If you have registered with a valid email address, this forum can be set to email you notifications of replies to your posts.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »