|
The material
evidence on this page is a quote of a directive interpreting a
law. This directive is stated in the form of:
If A, Then B.
The obverse
logic is
irrefutable and it states:
If not A, Then
not
B.
I expect cognitive
dissonance will be triggered for some of you
when you understand what A
and B
represent.
Do you "believe" you
have to file an IRS Form 1040 every year because the law says so? Most of you
who
have
that "belief"
are
wrong. A few
of you are correct.
Do you "believe" I
have to
file an IRS Form 1040 every year because the law says so? All of you
who have that "belief"
are
wrong. I've
actually
read the
law with my own two eyes. That's why I know that I
don't have to file an IRS Form 1040.
The material evidence
and logical proof
supporting the prior paragraph now follows:
The material
evidence: The instructions for IRS Form 1040,
which have
not changed in several years, state:
Our
legal
right to ask for information is Internal Revenue Code sections 6001,
6011, and 6012(a), and their regulations. They say that you must file a
return or statement with us for any tax you are liable
for. Your
response is mandatory under these sections.
(A
more detailed
study of the
laws cited can be examined deeper in
this website.)
The logical
proof:
- The above quotation of the Form 1040
instructions tell me that I
must file a return for any (income) tax I am "liable" for.
- The above quotation does not tell me
that I must
file a return for any (income) tax I am not "liable" for.
- Therefore, My
response is not
mandatory if I am not
"liable"
for any (income) tax".
- Therefore, I am not
required to file a return if there is no mechanism or law that makes me
"liable"
for the (income) tax". (A "mechanism"
itself must also be a creation of "law",
Therefore, "What law
makes me liable for the income tax?" is still the valid
question.)
- After several years of studying the Internal
Revenue
Code and the applicable Code of Federal Regulations, I have not found
any law that specifically makes me liable for
the "income" tax. An example of a law making a person liable for
the "distilled spirits" tax is shown below.
- What has been presented to me by the Status
Quo Brigade as the laws that make me liable for the "income"
tax does not meet the standards of material evidence
and logical proof and that faulty answer will be specifically addressed
later.
- Therefore, since I am not made liable for
an "income" tax on what I am paid in compensation for my labor, I am
not required to fill out the 1040 income tax form.
A prudent
person who knows that the requirement to file a Form 1040 is based upon
being liable for an income tax would want to know the
mechanism or law that makes them bona
fide liable for an income
tax.
What
law makes me liable for the income tax?
If the question was "What law makes me liable for the
distilled
spirits tax?", the question could be quickly
answered - "Section 5005."
TITLE
26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Subtitle E - Alcohol, Tobacco, and Certain Other Excise Taxes
CHAPTER 51 - DISTILLED SPIRITS, WINES, AND BEER
Subchapter A - Gallonage and Occupational Taxes
PART I - GALLONAGE TAXES
Subpart A - Distilled Spirits
Sec. 5005. Persons liable for tax
(a) General
The
distiller or importer of distilled spirits shall be liable
for the taxes imposed thereon by section 5001(a)(1).
My
dictionary defines "liable"
as "Legally obligated;
responsible". Therefore, clearly, the above quoted Code
Section is stating:
The distiller or importer of distilled
spirits shall
be legally obligated for payment of the distilled spirits
taxes
imposed...
The imposition of a liability is the
imposition of a legal obligation. If the obligation is not
imposed, the
obligation does not exist.
As proven above, If someone is not
"liable"
for an income tax, Then someone is not
required to file a Form 1040. Therefore, What law
makes me liable for the income
tax? is a very important
question.
When asked, "What
law makes me liable for the income tax?" the IRS does not answer
the question and state the law. Instead, the IRS threatens,
ignores, and evades. The IRS has REFUSED (note)
to directly and concisely answer this and other very important
questions asked by myself and others. Consider
these points
of logic:
- The IRS can NOT answer this question IF
there is no
law imposing liability for the income tax.
- If there is a law
imposing this liability, then
the
IRS would be able to quell the rising tide of people asking the
question, by simply doing what I did with the 5005 distilled
spirits liability section. Would a reasonable person argue
that there
is no law imposing liability and legal obligation to pay the distilled
spirits tax?
"The
law must be there somewhere" is a belief based not upon
material evidence and logical proof, but upon a lie accepted as true.
"The
law must be there somewhere" is what the IRS wants you to "believe", so that
you don't go looking for this law that the IRS refuses to identify.
If you make
the statement, "The
law must be there somewhere",
then you have issued a lie, passing it along like a
person
does a rumor heard and mindlessly repeated at a water
fountain.
If the
preceding is what you "believe",
I challenge you to cure your ignorance
by using this computer you are sitting in front of to find exactly
WHERE the law actually is
that "must be there
somewhere."
If you can prove your "belief" correct,
then you can prove me wrong. If you can not
prove your "belief"
correct,
then you will have proven me correct.
When you fail to prove your "belief"
correct, you will have then verified for yourself
that the
law establishing liability for the
income tax does not exist.
BUT WAIT!
THERE'S MORE!
The above cited material evidence is only the
beginning of challenging the common (albeit erroneous) "belief" regarding
the income tax. The above evidence does not stand alone. There is much
more to be shown to you if
you have the courage to look with an open mind.
I have
courage.
I'm
a coward
|
