Synaptic Sparks icon image

IRS Form W-4

Synaptic Sparks
Home
Main Table of Contents
Comment on this page
Discussion Forum
Legal Warning page
Law lookup links
W-4 Form image

At some point in the hiring process for a new job, a new hire will be given a Form W-4 to fill out. The reason often stated is because, "The law says so."

Actually the law says so only for certain classes of person. If you are not in any of those classes of person, the law does not require you to fill out the form. Likewise, if your company is not in those certain classes of person required to collect the information, then the law does not require your company to collect the form.

Form W-4 states what law applies to itself:

Image: Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice.

The Internal Revenue Code requires this information under sections 3402(f)(2)(A) and 6109 and their regulations.

Verify: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw4.pdf


Section 6109 and its regulations are a "mouse in a maze looking for cheese" type of law. Mazes can be fun and this one is. Let's go find that piece of cheese.

Let us take a look at the written words of law that apply in regard to giving your social security number to a company you work for. 

Internal Revenue Code
Sec. 6109. Identifying numbers

(a) Supplying of identifying numbers
When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary:

(2) Furnishing number to other persons
Any person with respect to whom a return, statement, or other document is required under the authority of this title to be made by another person or whose identifying number is required to be shown on a return of another person shall furnish to such other person such identifying number as may be prescribed for securing his proper identification.

Clearly, if your company is required to submit a document to the IRS with your information on it, then you must give your number to your company as prescribed by the Secretary's tax regulations. Conversely:

  • This section does not apply unless there is actually a requirement under the authority of this title (Internal Revenue Code) that requires your company to submit the documents to the IRS.
  • This section does not apply unless the Secretary makes it apply by prescribing regulations. 
  • If neither of the above is met, you are not required to give your number to your company.

Let us take a look at the written words of law that apply to your company in regard to asking you for your social security number. 

Internal Revenue Code
Sec. 6109. Identifying numbers
 
(a) Supplying of identifying numbers
When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary:

(3) Furnishing number of another person
Any person required under the authority of this title to make a return, statement, or other document with respect to another person shall request from such other person, and shall include in any such return, statement, or other document, such identifying number as may be prescribed for securing proper identification of such other person.

If your company is required to submit a document to the IRS with your number on it, your company is required to ask you for your number, and your company is required to put it on their document as prescribed by the Secretary's tax regulations.

  • This section does not apply unless there is actually a requirement under the authority of this title (Internal Revenue Code)  that requires your company to submit the documents to the IRS.
  • This section does not apply unless the Secretary makes it apply by prescribing regulations.
  • If neither of the above is met, you are not required to give your number to your company.

So let's turn another corner in this maze and find the regulations that apply.

Code of Federal Regulations
 Information and Returns
 
Sec. 301.6109-1  Identifying numbers.
(b) Requirement to furnish one's own number--
(1) U.S. persons.
A U.S. person whose number must be included on a document filed by another person must give the taxpayer identifying number so required to the other person on request.

If your company is required to put your number on its document, you are required to give your number to your company.

  • If your company is not required to put your number on its document, you are not required to give your number to your company.
  • This regulation does not tell you if your company is required to put your number on its document.
  • Therefore, this regulation by itself does not require you to give your number to your company.

Code of Federal Regulations
 Information and Returns
 
Sec. 301.6109-1  Identifying numbers.

(c) Requirement to furnish another's number.

Every person required under this title to make a return, statement, or other document must furnish such taxpayer identifying numbers of other U.S. persons and foreign persons that are described in paragraph (b)(2)(i), (ii), (iii), (vi), (vii), or (viii) of this section as required by the forms and the accompanying instructions.

Your company is required to furnish your number on its form if you are described in the cited paragraph sections.

  • If the cited paragraph does not describe you, then your company is not required to put your number on its form.
  • If the cited paragraph does not describe you, then you are not required to give your number to your company.

Sec. 301.6109-1  Identifying numbers.

(c) Requirement to furnish another's number.

If the person making the return, statement, or other document does not know the taxpayer identifying number of the other person, and such other person is one that is described in paragraph (b)(2)(i), (ii), (iii), (vi), (vii), or (viii) of this section, such person must request the other person's number.

The request should state that the identifying number is required to be furnished under authority of law.

If your company does not know your number, and you are described in the cited paragraph, your company is required to request your number "under authority of law".

  • If you are not described in the cited paragraph, your number is not "required to be furnished under authority of law".

Let's get that piece of cheese. Let's see if you are described in the cited paragraph.

Code of Federal Regulations
Sec. 301.6109-1  Identifying numbers.

(b) Requirement to furnish one's own number--
(2) Foreign persons.
(i) A foreign person that has income effectively connected [...]
(ii) A foreign person that has a U.S. office or [...]
(iii) A nonresident alien treated as a resident under section 6013 [...]
(vi) A foreign person that furnishes a withholding certificate [...]
(vii) A foreign person whose taxpayer identifying number is [...]
(viii) A foreign person that furnishes a withholding certificate [...]

If you are a foreign person or a nonresident alien, then your "identifying number is required to be furnished under authority of law."

  • If you are not a foreign person or a nonresident alien, then your "identifying number is" not "required to be furnished under authority of law."

I am not within the class of person to which section 6109 applies. Are you?


With section 6109 and its regulations found to be without application, that leaves section 3402(f)(2)(A) and its regulations as the only other avenue to require one to fill out a W-4 form.

TITLE 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Subtitle C - Employment Taxes
CHAPTER 24 - COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT SOURCE ON WAGES

Sec. 3402. Income tax collected at source

(f) Withholding exemptions
(2) Exemption certificates
(A) On commencement of employment
On or before the date of the commencement of employment with an employer, the employee shall furnish the employer with a signed withholding exemption certificate relating to the number of withholding exemptions which he claims, which shall in no event exceed the number to which he is entitled.

Are you an "employee"? Is your company an "employer"? Are you paid "wages"?

DO NOT ANSWER THE QUESTIONS UNTIL YOU READ THE STATUTORY DEFINITIONS!


The statutory definitions are found in section 3401.

TITLE 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Subtitle C - Employment Taxes
CHAPTER 24 - COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT SOURCE ON WAGES

Sec. 3401. Definitions

(a) Wages
For purposes of this chapter, the term "wages" means all
remuneration (other than fees paid to a public official) for
services performed by an employee for his employer, including the
cash value of all remuneration (including benefits) paid in any
medium other than cash; except that such term shall not include [things that don't matter for the purpose of this web page.]
  • Please note that the statutory definition of "wages" is dependent upon the statutory definition of "employee".
  • If you are not an employee, you are not paid wages.
  • If your company is not an employer, you are not paid wages.

This is an example of law that is designed to make you think it says something other than what it actually says. You must look at the statutory definition of "employee" to know what this law is actually saying.


TITLE 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Subtitle C - Employment Taxes
CHAPTER 24 - COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT SOURCE ON WAGES

Sec. 3401. Definitions

(d) Employer
For purposes of this chapter, the term "employer" means the person for whom an individual performs or performed any service, of whatever nature, as the employee of such person, except that - [these exceptions don't matter for the purpose of this web page.]
  • Please note that the statutory definition of "employer" is dependent upon the statutory definition of "employee".
  • If you are not an employee, your company is not an employer.

This is another example of law that is designed to make you think it says something other than what it actually says. In this case, the gobbledegook is readily apparent when pointed out.

You must look at the statutory definition of "employee" to know what this law is saying.


TITLE 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Subtitle C - Employment Taxes
CHAPTER 24 - COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT SOURCE ON WAGES

Sec. 3401. Definitions

(c) Employee
For purposes of this chapter, the term "employee" includes an officer, employee, or elected official of the United States, a State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term "employee" also includes an officer of a corporation.

For the purposes of collecting an income tax at source on wages, the employees which the law applies to are officers, employees, and elected officials of the (federal) 'government' and the officers of federal corporations like the TVA or the BPA.

  • If you are not an employee as defined in this definition, then you are not an employee required to fill out an IRS Form W-4.

I am not within the class of person to which section 3402(f)(2)(A) applies. Are you?


My dictionary defines a "class" as "A set, collection, group, or configuration containing members regarded as having certain attributes or traits in common; a kind or category."

Understanding that section 3402(f)(2)(A) applies to the class of person defined in section 3401(c) is important to understanding who the law acts upon, and how the Status Quo Brigade will attempt to corrupt that understanding when they attack what you have just read.

The word "includes" is a word of limitation, but based upon context can be a word of limited expansion. The Status Quo Brigade argue the word "includes" creates unlimited expansion by citing another law that is meant to create misunderstanding and make you believe "includes" is a term of unlimited expansion. That law is specifically addressed elsewhere on this website. Meanwhile:

in·clude tr.v. in·clud·ed, in·clud·ing, in·cludes. 1. To take in as a part, an element, or a member. 2. To contain as a secondary or subordinate element. 3. To consider with or place into a group, class, or total.

[Middle English includen, from Latin inclūdere, to enclose : in-, in; see IN-2 + claudere, to close.]
Source: American Heritage Electronic Dictionary

The root word of includes means to enclose; to surround on all sides; close in. Swapping thesaurus synonyms into the first part of the definition statute makes clear what the Status Quo Brigade intends to obfuscate.

  • the term "employee" includes an officer, employee, or elected official
  • the term "employee" encloses an officer, employee, or elected official
  • the term "employee" contains an officer, employee, or elected official
  • the term "employee" embodies an officer, employee, or elected official
  • the term "employee" embraces an officer, employee, or elected official
  • the term "employee" encompasses an officer, employee, or elected official
  • the term "employee" incorporates an officer, employee, or elected official
  • the term "employee" involves an officer, employee, or elected official
  • the term "employee" takes in an officer, employee, or elected official

The root word and all the synonyms make it clear that the purpose of the law is to identify a class of persons and to limit to that class only those persons having characteristics common to the class. 

In this case, being paid by the federal government (an excise taxable privilege) is the characteristic in common for all members of the class.

Return to where you left the U.S. Federal Income Tax page.

Document made with Nvu
November 2008