I am not a Tax Lawyer, Nor do I play Dan Evans on the internet.
I am not a Certified Public Accountant, Nor do I play Paul Thomas on the internet.
I am not an Enrolled Agent, Nor do I play Richard Macdonald on the internet.
DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE.
Go look it up for yourself.
Mr. Famspear, Today is April 21, 2006. I, Dale Eastman, am
calling you out.
Your choice of forums are as follows: You can email me directly; You
can email me via an anonymous remailer utility; you can post your
comments on the HaloScan portion of Trial Logs Blogspot; or You can
post your comments on the misc.taxes news group. Your comments will be
transferred to my web page basically unedited. I will correct typo's,
hyperlink references, and format your text as best I can to best
represent what you are stating. Just tell me what you want. My answers
will be on that same page, and I will post an alert in the forum of
choice to let you know when I have responded. I will look for your
response here unless you choose to engage by email to me directly. I'm
just a dumb ex-truck driver, so you should be able to make mincemeat
out of me, eh? http://www.synapticsparks.info/them/famspear2.html
Dear Mr. Eastman: First of all, I'll decide what the "choice of forums" is. The forum might be something other than what you listed. Second, I'll decide what we're going to do in that forum. Third, if I were you I wouldn't be so eager to get to whatever it is you want to get to. You are not going to be a happy camper. For now, if you want, you can watch my talk page here in Wikipedia -- it'll probably be a while, but I'll try to get a message to you there in the next few weeks. Regards, Famspear 18:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
"First of all, I'll decide what the "choice of forums" is."
This page IS the page of record. This is where our dialog is going to reside. You may choose to post your replies anywhere you want so long as I can get to them to read them. My replies are going to be right here. My only concern with regard to choice of forum is to allow you to maintain your semi-anonymity. I care not that you hide in the shade of your computer, so long as you have honest dialog.
"Second, I'll decide what we're going to do in that forum."
You can decide what YOU are going to do in that forum. You will decide NOTHING for me.
I intend that we are going to discuss tax law. I intend that such a discussion is laid out in the open for all to read. I intend to prove what the "TAX HONESTY PROPONENTS" have been saying about the WRITTEN WORDS of tax LAW. What do you intend?
"Third, if I were you I wouldn't be so eager to get to whatever it is you want to get to. You are not going to be a happy camper."
"it'll probably be a while, but I'll try to get a message to you there in the next few weeks."
Wouldn't it be best for you to make this dumb ex-trucker an unhappy camper sooner than later? You said you were busy because of tax season. Tax season is over.
Head's up, here's the first serve:
 Is labor property?
No reply from Mr. Famspear, as of 4/29/06 - 18:24 CDT. In other posts, Mr. Famspear has defended the conventional belief as the IRS would have others believe. That make Mr. Famspear a "defacto" IRS Agent.
Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. . . We cannot condone this shocking behavior by the IRS [or its defacto agents]. Our revenue system is based on the good faith of the taxpayer and the taxpayers should be able to expect the same from the government in its enforcement and collection activities." U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299. See also U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032; Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932.
Silence can only be equated with fraud. Are you a fraud Mr. Famspear? http://www.synapticsparks.info/them/famspear2.html
DRE - 4/29/06 - 18:24 CDT.
 Is labor property?