Private Social Media Platform

https://mises.org/library/isaiahs-job

Dale Eastman DO NOT trust the Mises Institute. They are a right-wing organization pretending to be for liberty. The founders were Republican Party supporters, and years ago this used to be easy to prove. They had a detailed search engine and all one needed to do was search their site for "Republican," "Trump," etc., and up would come all the articles supporting the GOP. They changed the search engine so it's not as thorough anymore.

Are you admitting that you did NOT bother to read the words of Nock; Your blather of words having NOTHING to do with my point of presenting Isaiah's Job?

It's all part of shill work, like when Republicans say "liberty" and Democrats say "peace." We never let shill organizations post, or get posted here without warning others.

That's twice you have deliberately ignored my point.

Dale Eastman I think you are ignoring MY point!

Dale Eastman Try finding the same information from a site, that you can share here, that is not using it to further the goal of the aggression based political right or left.

Dale Eastman, He is saying that we try to be mindful about sources that happen to be shills by adding a note for all members to see, so they can get a heads up that you support the words of the article but you don't support the shill group website hosting it.
Jeff Smith was trying to give you a heads up, not discredit the words in the article.

Why does this sound like ”who cares what the message is- just discredit it because you don’t like the messenger”? Reminds me of Martin Luther King (in the 60’s) being ignored because he was “colored”

No one is discrediting the message. We are discrediting the message being used to aid support for an aggression based political party. It's a tactic of shill work. The goal they are using is to get people to believe that the messenger (and the Republican Party) are also for liberty. Think of it this way; we all know politicians make fake promises to get elected, right? The tactic being used here is in the same realm. "We're for liberty ... and here's a politician you should support because he's for liberty too!" This was Ron Paul's tactic.
There are other ways to share a message without sharing the shill work.

Politics is a very deceptive swindle.

I suppose asking the question, "No shit?" to confirm this story... On the other hand, since this is a time leading to an election...

Dale Eastman, btw your "good candidate", albeit while not wearing a wig, is also shit because he is a UK citizen and can't be POTUS. However, I agree they are all shit. All politicians worldwide are granted parliamentary privilege (Americans incorrectly call it immunity), supposedly just for debate purposes inside the parliamentary house. However, this is extended outside of the debate house to everything so they can act as puppets and do dirty deeds done dirt cheap for the big-money elite. For example, Bush, UK PM Blair & AU PM Howard destroyed iRaQ and a million Iraqis based on the known lie of WMDs. Hence, when funded, I will go on a worldwide campaign for all political candidates to surrender parliamentary privilege. www.foi.today

SF, you and I are having a failure to communicate.





Dale Eastman, btw your "good candidate", albeit while not wearing a wig, is also shit because he is a UK citizen and can't be POTUS. However, I agree they are all shit. All politicians worldwide are granted parliamentary privilege (Americans incorrectly call it immunity), supposedly just for debate purposes inside the parliamentary house. However, this is extended outside of the debate house to everything so they can act as puppets and do dirty deeds done dirt cheap for the big-money elite. For example, Bush, UK PM Blair & AU PM Howard destroyed iRaQ and a million Iraqis based on the known lie of WMDs. Hence, when funded, I will go on a worldwide campaign for all political candidates to surrender parliamentary privilege. www.foi.today

Dale Eastman Disobey our laws and find out! But then, you do have the right to choose your own time of death; unless they put you in a straitjacket or padded cell, that is!

our laws?

Please identify which of my words or post you are replying to with these words of yours:
Disobey our laws and find out! But then, you do have the right to choose your own time of death; unless they put you in a straitjacket or padded cell, that is!

DS That is right! Our laws, the laws this country control what you can do without being incarcerated ot shot dead. Nihilism is an excuse to do nothing and still bitch about everything!

Dale Eastman Not choosing to be controlled or who to be controlled does not mean you will not be controlled. Even the weather controls you. Choose what you will to make yourself comfortable. Not voting is a choice; but not being controlled good man, is not a choice. We are all controlled. Thoughts are free to an extent and admittedly, freedom is an attitude....but one that can be adjusted, like it or no!

I put a like on your reply... Because you did reply.

You added information of your thinking sufficient for me to assume, for the moment, that you and I have two contrary ideologies about living as a human, and living morally.

As I have posted many times: You are for liberty or you are for slavery. And as I wrote in an essay, this is NOT a false dichotomy.

You have stated "We are all controlled."

There are those who do attempt to control others. By what authority? I always have to define that when I ask by what authority, I specifically mean, By what Right-to-rule?

OMG, Did I ever misunderstand you. I took your statement as nhilistic; but I see you are against despotism. I couldn't agree more. I will NEVER attempt to control you; but wish you happy hunting: happy fishing...and a very happy uninslaved life!

I appreciate that a communication error was averted. I also erred in what I assumed about you because of how I interpreted your words.

This is all me:
https://synapticsparks.info/

Hey IRS... You're part of government, right?

Quote

I DEMAND to know where the certified copies of my alleged consent,
with my signature on the consent form is being stored.

I DEMAND to know where the certified copies of the terms
 I allegedly agreed to are being stored.

I DEMAND proof of this alleged consent
to be governed, ruled, or owned
be presented IMMEDIATELY.

Failure to do so immediately is government's testimony,
and my evidence, that this alleged consent does not exist.

synapticsparks.info

Dale Eastman when is consent needed for taxation?

My apology. I do not know what your ideology is in regard to government and its enslavement. Sorry.

Dale Eastman Proof of enslavement? Sorry, so many younglings misusing that word, I have to check and see if you're relying on feelings or facts

If you're in the territorial boundaries, they have jurisdiction to enforce their laws. Don't like it? Revolt

Thank you for confirming what I only suspected.

Kudos that you actually asked an inquiry question:
"Proof of enslavement?"

I am going to answer your question with my own question to check if YOU are relying on feelings or facts, as well as determine if you wish to refuse to admit to the accuracy of this definition of slavery (enslavement).

The definition:
A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.

Admit or Deny?

I also have questions to clarify your claim about "jurisdiction"... Later.

Dale Eastman I see you failed to cite your definition. So far, you seem to be relying on emotion. You're the only one being audited here.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/slavery
Do you fall under the defined description, citizen?

I see you don't know how to read.

Those words you failed to read:

A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.

Admit or Deny?

Dale Eastman I see you're projecting already. The reference is there for you to read/use.

Your subjective understanding is irrelevant. You may refer to facts/legal definitions.

Do you fall under the described conditions, citizen?

Was your last reply an admission or a denial?

Dale Eastman Your lack.of response can be taken as an inability to comprehend the term "slavery". Do you not fall under the described conditions?

You asked these questions:
"Proof of enslavement?"
"Do you fall under the defined description?"
"Do you not fall under the described conditions?"

I asked you to Admit or Deny the definition I provided.
You have deliberately NOT addressed that definition I provided.
You  have deliberately concisely NOT Denied the provided definition.
This is an act of EQUIVOCATION: an ambiguous or deliberately evasive statement.
As I review your words I see you attempting to red herring the discussion away from my presented definition.

My presented definition addresses a specific trait, property, attribute, characteristic, element & condition of being a slave. A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.

You can NOT deny this.

Your dishonesty is going to end this discussion quite soon. I have had many interactions with others just as dishonest as you are proving yourself to be.

Note to self: Topic change regarding my suspicion regarding this person's ideology?

Dale Eastman Mmm denied.

So you admit you aren't under enslavement, or facing any form of slavery.

At least you kinda tried?

Guess lying to yourself failed like all the others. Victim mongering seems to be a very inefficient means of getting sympathy, you won't find any here, citizen.

Guess you can't prove any alleged theft.

https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1697.0

Dale Eastman Is your consent at all needed or relevant for taxation?

Are you aware of these words and where they come from:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed?

If you know these words then you know why my consent is needed.

Dale Eastman Incorrect, your misinterpretations are moot.
Where in fine print does it state taxation requires consent?

If a person is publicly posting their words they want to convey an opinion, a fact, an observation, a feeling, a belief, or even something a little more complex like an Ideology.

Or they just want to be an asshole troll for the purpose of annoying others.

Sometimes the intent is not immediately discernible.

At this time I do not know if you are trying to be a camouflaged subtle troll or if you have some other idea (ideology) you wish to present.

What is your purpose in replying to my post in the first place?

What do you actually want to make humans aware of?

Dale Eastman You failed to show how consent is relevant or at all needed for taxation.
You're still ruled, and will continue to be ruled, without individual consent, as you voluntarily reside in a body politic with laws.

You're welcome for the clarification.

I saw your disrespectful laugh reacts. Your unwillingness to engage in respectful dialog means you're blocked you government school brainwashed stupid fuck.