Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Misc. / 7214 Cuz CRS
« Last post by Dale Eastman on Today at 03:42:00 AM »
 
 

 
<< Previous   TITLE 26 / Subtitle F / CHAPTER 75 / Subchapter A / PART I / § 7214   Next >>
[Print]    [Print selection]
[OLRC Home]Help
 
26 USC 7214: Offenses by officers and employees of the United States Text contains those laws in effect on April 23, 2024
From Title 26-INTERNAL REVENUE CODESubtitle F-Procedure and AdministrationCHAPTER 75-CRIMES, OTHER OFFENSES, AND FORFEITURESSubchapter A-CrimesPART I-GENERAL PROVISIONS
Jump To: Source CreditMiscellaneousAmendmentsEffective Date
§7214. Offenses by officers and employees of the United States
(a) Unlawful acts of revenue officers or agents

Any officer or employee of the United States acting in connection with any revenue law of the United States-

(1) who is guilty of any extortion or willful oppression under color of law; or

(2) who knowingly demands other or greater sums than are authorized by law, or receives any fee, compensation, or reward, except as by law prescribed, for the performance of any duty; or

(3) who with intent to defeat the application of any provision of this title fails to perform any of the duties of his office or employment; or

(4) who conspires or colludes with any other person to defraud the United States; or

(5) who knowingly makes opportunity for any person to defraud the United States; or

(6) who does or omits to do any act with intent to enable any other person to defraud the United States; or

(7) who makes or signs any fraudulent entry in any book, or makes or signs any fraudulent certificate, return, or statement; or

(8) who, having knowledge or information of the violation of any revenue law by any person, or of fraud committed by any person against the United States under any revenue law, fails to report, in writing, such knowledge or information to the Secretary; or

(9) who demands, or accepts, or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly as payment or gift, or otherwise, any sum of money or other thing of value for the compromise, adjustment, or settlement of any charge or complaint for any violation or alleged violation of law, except as expressly authorized by law so to do;

shall be dismissed from office or discharged from employment and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. The court may in its discretion award out of the fine so imposed an amount, not in excess of one-half thereof, for the use of the informer, if any, who shall be ascertained by the judgment of the court. The court also shall render judgment against the said officer or employee for the amount of damages sustained in favor of the party injured, to be collected by execution.
(b) Interest of internal revenue officer or employee in tobacco or liquor production

Any internal revenue officer or employee interested, directly or indirectly, in the manufacture of tobacco, snuff, or cigarettes, or in the production, rectification, or redistillation of distilled spirits, shall be dismissed from office; and each such officer or employee so interested in any such manufacture or production, rectification, or redistillation or production of fermented liquors shall be fined not more than $5,000.
(c) Cross reference

For penalty on collecting or disbursing officers trading in public funds or debts or property, see 18 U.S.C. 1901.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 856 ; Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §204(5), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1429 ; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834 .)
2
Discussions; Public Archive / JH
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 21, 2024, 12:29:20 PM »
Quote from: 21 April @ 05:26
with a few modifications I can make my pickup run on vegetable oil. Can you do that with your electric piece of shit?
Quote from: 21 April @ 0553
No, but I can get electricity from the sky.
Quote from: 21 April @ 0557
sure you can. Right after you ride your unicorn 🦄 to the cotton candy fields.
Quote from: 21 April @ 0612
They're called solar panels. Maybe you've heard of them?
Quote from: 21 April @ 0638
I call them hazardsouq (SIC)
Normally I ignore typo's. As you will see below, JH has not earned getting a pass on typo's.
Quote from: 21 April @ 0638
I call them hazardous waste. Get someone to explain it to you.
Quote from: 21 April @ 0643
While they're explaining the issue... Your cell phone & computer.

I was aware of the issues of e-waste. That's why I posted what I posted. At the time of copy-pasting this nasty person's interaction with me, I searched for something to support my claim, Cell phones and computers ARE e-waste.

Electronic waste, commonly known as e-waste, refers to discarded electrical or electronic devices. This category of waste includes a wide range of products, anything from small gadgets like smartphones and MP3 players to larger appliances such as refrigerators, air conditioners, and televisions.

When properly recycled, the valuable materials within e-waste can be safely recovered and reintroduced into the manufacturing cycle, providing an opportunity for sustainable resource utilization. However, if not handled correctly, the hazardous substances in e-waste can pose significant environmental and health risks.

Quote from: 21 April @ 0655
you want to compare the levels of hazardous waste in a car or panels to my phone? You really are stupid.
Quote from: 21 April @ 0656
I don’t own a computer. Just the phone.

So how does your not owning a computer make your cell phone not e-waste at the end of its life?

Quote from: 21 April @ 0838
Why did you call me by your maiden name?
Quote from: 21 April @ 0901
you want to suck my what?
Quote from: 21 April @ 0908
You are Illiterate and not capable off having detailed discussion with others.
Quote from: 21 April @ 0911
says the brain dead leftist lunatic
Quote from: 21 April @ 0913
I have a Madm Lou

Normally I ignore typo's. As you see, JH, with a Master’s in English, does not know how to edit or delete a fucked up draft of a potential post, or he never learned to proof read what he wrote. Either way he has not earned getting a pass on typo's.

Quote from: 21 April @ 0913
I have a Master’s in English. Did you finish kindergarten?
Quote from: 21 April @ 0913
You must be a Votard.



Votard = Voting Retard. Voters that refuse to recognize voting for the lessor of two evils IS STILL VOTING FOR EVIL!

Rude and crude, that image shows my respect for any political candidate or political party. So this highly schooled moron assumed I wasn't in his party. (That part's true. And I'm not part of the other party either.)


Quote from: 21 April @ 0918
Yet you can't collect your thoughts to cogently articulate your position. Child, I am not impressed by your crayon scribbles on the internet. Present your website link so I can read your English Masters words
Quote from: 21 April @ 0926
listen up asshole, what you call facts are bald faced lies. Pull your head out of your ass. The manufacturing process creates hazardous waste. They last between 0 and 20 years and then are also hazardous waste. And they never produce enough electricity to offset their cost. But hey, live in your dream world.
Quote from: 21 April @ 1024
I check claims for validity. What, exactly, are YOU claiming are the "facts" you are claiming I have posted? I'm also checking your ability to read.
Quote from: 21 April @ 1331
https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1725.0
3
Discussions; Public Archive / GV
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 15, 2024, 11:46:16 AM »
Quote from: 15 April @ 06:04
But do you understand air power and tanks
Quote
There is much debate over if the United States will see a second Civil War, especially with the tense 2024 election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden approaching. Many believe that if Trump loses, the Republicans or the Right will rebel and cause a second American civil war, one that many believe they will win. But can conservatives actually win a civil war? Who would REALLY win a civil war in the US? Despite what many within right-wing circles seem to believe, the right is at a massive disadvantage. This why the right can't win a 2nd civil war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcYYgcGjrP0
Quote from: 15 April @ 07:39
any "citizen" that unjustly rises against its government is a Traitor and Seditionist.
Quote from: 15 April @ 08:35
Define "unjustly"?
Quote from: 15 April @ 12:18
ones following a lying despot trying to stay in power....
Quote from: 15 April @ 12:48
YOU: any "citizen" that unjustly rises against its government is a Traitor and Seditionist.
ME: Define "unjustly"?
YOU: ones following a lying despot trying to stay in power....

I apologize for not recognizing that you are a VOTARD shilling for which pile of shit you want as your tyrannical ruler.


4
Work-space to Compose / X April 2024
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 14, 2024, 01:16:41 PM »
Way too many of you are delusional fools. You believe un-truths as truths because you are not smart enough to think about and analyze what you have just had presented to you.

Unlike most of you, I do think about and analyze what has been presented to me.

What was presented to me when I was in Sixth grade was $9.00 week in return for my services delivering a local County newspaper to about 60 customers in the small town where I lived.

That's nine single green pieces of paper with "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE" printed on their faces. Those nine green papers stored the value of my 7.5 hours of labor. At that time the value of my labor was 36 candy bars of a certain type I enjoyed. I learned and knew that money is a measure and of store value.

Liars in banking and liars in government don't want that definition to be used. It lays bare their crimes against humanity. That definition might make people question the value of their money and why is it decreasing?

Questions like this one I asked a person who presumed to educate me about banking: "If I stuffed $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress ten years ago, why are they not worth as much today as when I earned them?"

I was answered: "That’s called inflation"

This answer admitted that the value of $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value. This answer admitted that If my labor value stored in $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value, then some of the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's was stolen from me

I asked, "What actions, by whom, took the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's?"

That question ended the discussion regarding "inflation" and its actual effect on the value of money.

Many humans are confused as to what is actually being inflated. Very few are not aware that prices rising is a result of this "inflation". When, in those small minds, the definition of "inflation" incorrectly confuses the definition with one of its results, the merchant gets focused on, errantly, as the cause of the inflation. Why are you greedy thieves always raising the prices of the things I need and must purchase?

When this happens, the correct question does not get asked, nor its answer thought about. Why are my green pieces of paper with "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE" printed on their faces losing value?

If you do not recognize the loss of value of FRN's, you are a delusional fool.


5
Misc. / What Statute
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 14, 2024, 06:27:57 AM »
What statute in the Internal Revenue Code, using clear and unequivocal language as required by the Supreme Court, makes a private Citizen liable for subtitle A - income taxes on his or her domestically earned compensation for labor?

SCOTUS has said:
   In the interpretation of statutes levying taxes it is the established rule not to extend their provisions, by implication, beyond the clear import of the language used, or to enlarge their operations so as to embrace matters not specifically pointed out. In case of doubt they are construed most strongly against the government, and in favor of the citizen." GOULD v. GOULD, 245 U.S. 151 (1917).

 SCOTUS has said:
... [T]he well-settled rule ... the citizen is exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language, and that where the construction of a tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid... SPRECKELS SUGAR REFINING CO. v. MCCLAIN, 192 U.S. 397 (1904)

SCOTUS has said:
If it is law, it will be found in our books; if it is not to be found there, it is not law.
Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 627 (1886)

6
Local Log / 12 April 2024
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 12, 2024, 02:27:39 PM »
It has been my experience that delusional fools do NOT like their posted foolishness being openly questioned.

Quote from: OP on 11 April @ 1228
Greetings and Hello, Ladies, Gentlemen, and Votards of All Politics!!!

The provably-lying PK Simon has blocked me.

I speculate he did this because he didn't like my actually proving he was a liar. On 8 April @ 13:41 Liar Simon claimed: "I answered every question you asked."

I then uploaded a post containing the six questions he ignored along with the dates-times of the original posts containing these questions.

On 27 March @ 0747 I originally asked:
"If I stuffed $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress ten years ago, why are they not worth as much today as when I earned them?"

That question was placed in front of Simple Simon four times before he addressed it.

On 1 April @ 18:38 He finally answered: "That’s called inflation"

His answer admitted that the value of $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value.
His answer also admitted that If my labor value stored in $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value, then some of the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's was stolen from me

On 2 April @ 10:43 I asked this question: What causes this "INFLATION"?
In reviewing my question I realized I needed to be more specific with my question.
On 7 April @ 16:18 I then asked, "What actions, by whom, took the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's?"

Simple Simon ignored the store of value issue and ignored the loss of value issue.

The entire discussion I had with Simple Simon, complete with text formatting that Fecalbook can't provide, can be read at:
 https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1715.0
7
Discussions; Public Archive / Re: PS
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 11, 2024, 11:12:14 AM »
Quote from: OP on 11 April @ 1228
Greetings and Hello, Ladies, Gentlemen, and Votards of All Politics!!!

The provably-lying PK Simon has blocked me.

I speculate he did this because he didn't like my actually proving he was a liar. On 8 April @ 13:41 Liar Simon claimed: "I answered every question you asked."

I then uploaded a post containing the six questions he ignored along with the dates-times of the original posts containing these questions.

On 27 March @ 0747 I originally asked:
"If I stuffed $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress ten years ago, why are they not worth as much today as when I earned them?"

That question was placed in front of Simple Simon four times before he addressed it.

On 1 April @ 18:38 He finally answered: "That’s called inflation"

His answer admitted that the value of $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value.
His answer also admitted that If my labor value stored in $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value, then some of the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's was stolen from me

On 2 April @ 10:43 I asked this question: What causes this "INFLATION"?
In reviewing my question I realized I needed to be more specific with my question.
On 7 April @ 16:18 I then asked, "What actions, by whom, took the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's?"

Simple Simon ignored the store of value issue and ignored the loss of value issue.

The entire discussion I had with Simple Simon, complete with text formatting that Fecalbook can't provide, can be read at:
 https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1715.0
8
Discussions; Public Archive / Re: PS
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 09, 2024, 06:02:36 AM »
Quote from: 9 April @ 0701
I answered every question you asked.

Please note the date-time tags. they will assist you in reading the quoted words in situ.

Quote from: 4 April @ 0802
𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟙. Please explain exactly how money is not a store of value?

Quote from: 5 April @ 0708
𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟙. Please explain exactly how money is not a store of value?

Quote from: 5 April @ 0708
𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟚 Admit or deny that with those six words you denied that money is a store of value.

Quote from: 5 April @ 0958
𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟙. Please explain exactly how money is not a store of value?

You did finally address question after I asked it the third time.

Quote from: 5 April @ 1507
I didn’t claim money was NOT a “store of value”.

Quote from: 27 March @ 0747
If I stuffed $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress ten years ago, why are they not worth as much today as when I earned them?

Quote from: 27 March @ 1150
If I stuffed $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress ten years ago, why are they not worth as much today as when I earned them?

Quote from: 1 April @ 1838
You answered: ➽ That’s called inflation

I acknowledge you gave a partial answer.

I asked you:
Quote from: 2 April @ 1043
What causes this "INFLATION"?

I asked you:
Quote from: 7 April @ 1618
⇉ "𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟛. Admit or Deny that"[...]"Your answer admitted that the value of $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value."

I asked you:
Quote from: 7 April @ 1618
⇉ "𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟜. Admit or Deny that"[...] "If my labor value stored in $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value, then some of the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's was stolen from me."

I asked you:
Quote from: 7 April @ 1618
⇉ "𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟝. What actions, by whom, took the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's?"

Quote from: 8 April @ 1341
I answered every question you asked.

Quote from: 6 April @ 1620
⇉ "I copy-paste the words of liars, so I can prove their lies by displaying their actual words."

Quote from: 27 March @ 0747
I will be publicly archiving this discussion on my website.

Quote from: 27 March @ 1150
I will be publicly archiving this discussion on my website.

Quote from: 7 April @ 1618
I will be publicly archiving this discussion on my website.
Quote from: 9 April @ 0715
Thanks For proving my point, and displaying absolutely bizarre behavior.
Quote from: 9 April @ 0717
Yeah, this doesn’t scream “psychotic incel serial killer” at all.

I’m not sure your plodding obsessiveness reveals to the world what you think it does.


Quote from: Screencap
Quote from: 27 March @ 0747
⇉ I will be publicly archiving this discussion on my website.

Quote from: 27 March @ 1150
⇉ I will be publicly archiving this discussion on my website.

Quote from: 7 April @ 1618
⇉ I will be publicly archiving this discussion on my website.
Quote from: 9 April @ 0719
“It puts the lotion on its skin, or it gets the hose again”.

Okay there, Buffalo Bill.

You’ve managed to put the creepiness back in Facebook that it was missing.
Quote from: 9 April @ 1304
Quote from: 8 April @ 1341
I’m not sure your plodding obsessiveness reveals to the world what you think it does.

My "plodding obsessiveness reveals to the world" all the questions I have asked you that you have refused to answer.

Thus based on YOUR claim:
Quote from: 8 April @ 1341
I answered every question you asked.

I can honestly and accurately say: "You a LIAR!"

https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1715.msg17056#msg17056
Quote from: 9 April @ 1304
Dale, huh?

Other than your absolute, stalkerish obsession, what are you trying to make clear here?
Quote from: 9 April @ 1316
That you are provably a LIAR.
Quote from: 9 April @ 1318
Dale, I didn’t lie about anything.

Seek help.
Quote from: 9 April @ 1332
Dale, I didn’t lie about anything.

BULLSHIT!

https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1715.msg17056#msg17056
Quote from: 9 April @ 1336
Dale, you haven’t shown anything. If you think I “lied”, you’re either showing your lack of comprehension or your lack of knowledge of economics.

But above both possibilities, you’re demonstrating an emotional makeup that’s wrapped a little too tightly for social media.

It’s embarrassing to watch.
Quote from: 9 April @ 1337
In the spirit of me getting creeped out by this obsessive behavior, I’m going to put an end to this - whatever weirdness it is.

Have a nice day.
9
Local Log / 7 April 2024
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 07, 2024, 01:19:39 PM »
Way too many of you are delusional fools. You believe un-truths as truths because you are not smart enough to think about and analyze what you have just had presented to you.

Unlike most of you, I do think about and analyze what has been presented to me.

A specific example was provided during my incarceration in DAY JAIL, Also known as public school. The specific example is these words:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

Deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed
Many of you will recognize those words from the text of The U.S. Declaration of Independence.

Larken Rose eloquently observed:

There are two basic ways in which people can interact: by mutual agreement, or by one
person using threats or violence to force his will upon another.

The first can be labeled “consent”– both sides willingly and voluntarily agreeing to what is to be done. The second can be labeled “governing” – one person controlling another. Since these two – consent and governing – are opposites, the concept of “consent of the governed” is a contradiction. If there is mutual consent, it is not “government”; if there is governing, there is no consent.


In order for a person to consent (agree to something), don't they need to be given a choice?

Slave-masters and slave-owners are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the enslaved.

When were the slaves given a choice to consent to their enslavement?
When were you given a choice to consent to being governed?
10
Discussions; Public Archive / Re: PS
« Last post by Dale Eastman on April 07, 2024, 10:31:05 AM »
Quote from: 7 April @ 1618
https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1715.msg17051#msg17051

I told you that I will be publicly archiving this discussion on my website. I often peruse such saved discussions to remind myself of missed points, be the points deliberately ignored or simply overlooked. In re-reading the discussion I'm reminded that a question I asked was not adequately answered. To your credit you didn't ignore the question.

I asked: ⇉ If I stuffed $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress ten years ago, why are they not worth as much today as when I earned them?

You answered: ➽ That’s called inflation

Your answer admitted that the value of $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value.
𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟛. Admit or Deny that is what your answer admitted.

If my labor value stored in $4000 worth of Federal Reserve Notes in my mattress LOST value, then some of the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's was stolen from me.
𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟜. Admit or Deny that is what your answer admitted.

I admitted and then asked: ⇉ My error in not being specific enough with my question. What causes this "INFLATION"?
 In reviewing my question I realize I needed to be more specific with my question.

𝟘𝟘𝟘𝟝. What actions, by whom, took the purchasing power of the value of my labor stored in those FRN's?
Quote from: 8 April @ 1327
Dale, I get it.

You’re super full of yourself.
Quote from: 8 April @ 1341
I answered every question you asked.

Your response has been to claim I didn’t, using odd symbols and claiming you’re screenshotting and posting this somewhere else, as if that’s some sort of dark warning.

I couldn’t care less.

The problem is that you know nothing about the subject.

When I give answers, you don’t know enough to recognize that they *are* answers.

You don’t know enough to know that there aren’t economic facts, there are economic theories.

There are theories of inflation, some of which I think are nonsense (including what you apparently subscribe to, but don’t realize is just one of many theories).

You may not want to screenshot this stuff.

It’s going to look like a cave person telling a modern person that his flashlight is sorcery, and telling the modern person “I’m writing this down on my cave wall, so everyone knows how little you understand about sorcery”.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10