Author Topic: 98 pound woman & an equalizer  (Read 416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dale Eastman

  • Owner of myself and this website
  • Administrator
  • Promiscuous Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,967
  • Reputation 0
  • This space for rent
    • Synaptic Sparks
98 pound woman & an equalizer
« on: October 18, 2020, 08:59:30 AM »
Of course it boggles your mind. You've never considered the fact that if a 250 pound, muscle bound bad guy accosts a 98 pound female while swinging a baseball bat in an aggressive and threatening way, he will stop the moment that 98 pound female presents, not aims, not fires, but presents a hand gun with the self assurance of a woman who knows she can hit what she aims for.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2021, 05:06:30 PM by Admin »
Natural Law Matters

Offline Dale Eastman

  • Owner of myself and this website
  • Administrator
  • Promiscuous Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,967
  • Reputation 0
  • This space for rent
    • Synaptic Sparks
Re: 98 pound woman & an equalizer
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2021, 07:03:55 PM »
Transcription

One - One issue that always a boggles my mind
is that the idea that a gun is a defensive weapon.
Comments.

Of course it boggles your mind. You've never considered the fact that
if a 250 pound, muscle bound bad guy accosts a 98 pound female while
swinging a baseball bat in an aggressive and threatening way, he will
stop the moment that 98 pound female presents, not aims,
not fires, but presents a hand gun with the self assurance of a woman
who knows she can hit what she aims for.
That is a myth.
Sorry chief. Your myth is busted EVERY time a weapon is presented
and a crime doesn't happen. The best you can say in opposition is
that there are no statistics on the effective defense of simply
showing a weapon.
A gun is not a defensive weapon.
Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. disagrees with you.
Wisconsin sheriff urges residents to arm themselves

Diane Feinstein doesn't agree either, else she wouldn't have been
carrying a concealed gun and admitting it.
Note: Three still images, so shouldn't be to large a hit on those with bandwidth limits.



A gun is an offensive weapon, used to intimidate and
u-used to show power.
That's how you have trained your hired thugs to use them.
Police officers do not carry a gun as a defensive weapon
to defend themselves or their other officers.
Then they must be using them to intimidate and show power.
They carry a gun to be able ta to do their a job in a safe
and effective manner and and face any oppositions that
we may come upon.
And what job is that? Intimidate and show power.
If it was a defensive measure, why did we lose fifty five
officers nation wide last year to gun violence?
Maybe because they were intimidating somebody for committing a
victimless crime, like not wearing a seatbelt, and said victim of the
police intimidation, harassment, and showing of power had had enough.
And unfortunately in just the two months a of this year
so far we've lost two officers to gun violence in the
state of Californian alone.
Then stop intimidating the people.
We deal with gun violence on a daily basis.
That's because your thugs are dealing violence on a daily basis.
Google California police brutality
We are asking and have been asking for reasonable
regulations, not that, not that are going to impact
the a legal gun owner.
Right. Because thugs like you and yours want to make
gun ownership itself illegal.
We're asking for reasonable regulations that will help
us keep our communities and our officers safe.
Then why aren't you asking your citizens to get a gun
and get trained on how to use it?

Kennesaw Georgia requires (not enforced) its people to get guns and training.
2004 murder per 100K
3.8 - Kennesaw Source
6.9 - Georgia Source
6.7 - California Source

Same sources,
Robbery per 100K
34.3 - Kennesaw
153.1 - Georgia
176.1 - California


Thank you.

http://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=762.msg14996#msg14996
« Last Edit: March 26, 2021, 09:19:04 AM by Admin »
Natural Law Matters

Offline Dale Eastman

  • Owner of myself and this website
  • Administrator
  • Promiscuous Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,967
  • Reputation 0
  • This space for rent
    • Synaptic Sparks
Re: 98 pound woman & an equalizer
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2022, 03:30:25 PM »
𝓞𝓷𝓮 - 𝓞𝓷𝓮 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓪𝓵𝔀𝓪𝔂𝓼 𝓪 𝓫𝓸𝓰𝓰𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝔂 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓭 𝓲𝓼 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓪 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓪 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝔀𝓮𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓷.

Of course it boggles your mind. You've never considered the fact that if a 250 pound, muscle bound bad guy accosts a 98 pound female while swinging a baseball bat in an aggressive and threatening way, he will stop the moment that 98 pound female presents, not aims, not fires, but presents a hand gun with the self assurance of a woman who knows she can hit what she aims for.

𝓣𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓶𝔂𝓽𝓱.

Sorry chief. Your myth is busted EVERY time a weapon is presented and a crime doesn't happen. The best you can say in opposition is that there are no statistics on the effective defense of simply showing a weapon.

𝓐 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓲𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓽 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝔀𝓮𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓷.

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. disagrees with you.
Wisconsin sheriff urges residents to arm themselves

Diane Feinstein doesn't agree either, else she wouldn't have been carrying a concealed gun and admitting it.

𝓐 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓷 𝓸𝓯𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝔀𝓮𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓷, 𝓾𝓼𝓮𝓭 𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓾-𝓾𝓼𝓮𝓭 𝓽𝓸 𝓼𝓱𝓸𝔀 𝓹𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻.

That's how you have trained your hired thugs to use them.

𝓟𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓮 𝓸𝓯𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓽 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓻𝔂 𝓪 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓪𝓼 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝔀𝓮𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓷 𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓶𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻 𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓯𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓼.

Then they must be using them to intimidate and show power.

𝓣𝓱𝓮𝔂 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓻𝔂 𝓪 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓽𝓸 𝓫𝓮 𝓪𝓫𝓵𝓮 𝓽𝓪 𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻 𝓪 𝓳𝓸𝓫 𝓲𝓷 𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓯𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓮𝓯𝓯𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓷𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝔂 𝓸𝓹𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓼 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝔀𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝔂 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓷.

And what job is that? Intimidate and show power.

𝓘𝓯 𝓲𝓽 𝔀𝓪𝓼 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓪𝓼𝓾𝓻𝓮, 𝔀𝓱𝔂 𝓭𝓲𝓭 𝔀𝓮 𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓯𝓽𝔂 𝓯𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓸𝓯𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓼 𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝔀𝓲𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓽 𝔂𝓮𝓪𝓻 𝓽𝓸 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓿𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮?

Maybe because they were intimidating somebody for committing a victimless crime, like not wearing a seatbelt, and said victim of the police intimidation, harassment, and showing of power had had enough.

𝓐𝓷𝓭 𝓾𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓵𝔂 𝓲𝓷 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓽𝔀𝓸 𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓱𝓼 𝓪 𝓸𝓯 𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓼 𝔂𝓮𝓪𝓻 𝓼𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓻 𝔀𝓮'𝓿𝓮 𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓽 𝓽𝔀𝓸 𝓸𝓯𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓼 𝓽𝓸 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓿𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓯 𝓒𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓲𝓪𝓷 𝓪𝓵𝓸𝓷𝓮.

Then stop intimidating the people.

𝓦𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓪𝓵 𝔀𝓲𝓽𝓱 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓿𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓸𝓷 𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓲𝓵𝔂 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓲𝓼.

That's because your thugs are dealing violence on a daily basis.
Google California police brutality

𝓦𝓮 𝓪𝓻𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓴𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓮𝓷 𝓪𝓼𝓴𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓫𝓵𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓼, 𝓷𝓸𝓽 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽, 𝓷𝓸𝓽 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓪𝓻𝓮 𝓰𝓸𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓽 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓰𝓾𝓷 𝓸𝔀𝓷𝓮𝓻.

Right. Because thugs like you and yours want to make gun ownership itself illegal.

𝓦𝓮'𝓻𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓴𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓫𝓵𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓼 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝔀𝓲𝓵𝓵 𝓱𝓮𝓵𝓹 𝓾𝓼 𝓴𝓮𝓮𝓹 𝓸𝓾𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓸𝓾𝓻 𝓸𝓯𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓼 𝓼𝓪𝓯𝓮.

Then why aren't you asking your citizens to get a gun and get trained on how to use it?

Kennesaw Georgia requires (not enforced) its people to get guns and training.

2004 murder per 100K
3.8 - Kennesaw
6.9 - Georgia
6.7 - California

Robbery per 100K
34.3 - Kennesaw
153.1 - Georgia
176.1 - California
Natural Law Matters