Private Social Media Platform

How about you explain YOUR purpose in replying to a person you claim you are "just not listening, LOL" to.

Dale Eastman I don’t need to explain anything to you man, you’re just looking for attention and I give you a little because I feel sorry for your pathetic (😉

➽ I don’t need to explain anything to you man,

And yet you accommodated my request. Thank you.

By accommodating my request you've established that your claim of "just not listening" is a lie.

➽ you’re just looking for attention and I give you a little because I feel sorry for your pathetic (😉

Oh do please speculate some more. Why am I allegedly "looking for attention"? What is the actual purpose of this "looking for attention"?

Dale Eastman lol 😂 lots of words to try and prove you’re not in mommies basement, does she bring you chocolate milk?
“ We’re still not listening “

➽ We’re still not listening

Dale Eastman , your cry for help is sad

This may be a private group... Using only initials your bullshit is publicly archived here:
https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1676.msg16978#msg16978
You don't get called on your failure to focus by name... Regardless your Votard words and desire to be enslaved by arguing which tyrant you want to rule you is noted.

❶  You reply to my posts.
❷ I accept your invites to discuss our differing ideologies.
❸ Discussing differing ideologies means discussing the traits, properties, attributes, characteristics & elements of the ideologies.
❹ You don't do this.

Those four facts lead me to speculate as to why you won't engage in a serious discussion about the traits, properties, attributes, characteristics & elements of our differing ideologies.

1. You're not interested in actual discussion of our differing ideologies.
2. You're not interested in actual discussion of our differing ideologies because you know I will ask you questions about your ideologies.
3. You know I will expose your delusions with my questions.
4. You are so invested in what you "believe" you don't dare allow yourself to be exposed to facts that contradict your delusional beliefs.
5. You have nothing valid to say and you know this.
6. Your own words back at you: "You are lazy".
7. You are a coward.

Dale Eastman that lazy part hit home huh? You people that have all the answers are usually lazy gamers living with their parents, got indoctrinated by the government run education system , now, you've got it all figured out, were just not listening, LOL

➽ Dale Eastman that lazy part hit home huh?

That comment informs me about how you pretend to think.

➽ You people that have all the answers are usually lazy gamers living with their parents

Please present your evidence for making that claim.

➽ You people that have all the answers [...], got indoctrinated by the government run education system

You're a VOTARD. That means you just described yourself.

➽ You people that have all the answers [...], now, you've got it all figured out,

Yes, I do have "it" all figured out. If you are correct with your implied claim that I don't have "it" all figured out, then you should be able to prove what I don't have all figured out by engaging in meaningful discussion with me... Which you did not do with the post I am replying to, point by point.

➽ were just not listening, LOL

You can't prove me wrong if you don't listen and address the points I present.

PS:

Quote from: https://www.thesaurus.com › e › grammar › were-vs-were

"Were" Vs. "We're": We're Here To Explain The Difference
Learn the difference between were and we're, two words that are often confused. Were is the past tense of be, while we're is a contraction of we are. See how to use them in sentences and avoid common mistakes.

➽ What will not voting do?

You and I have attempted this discussion before.  https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1676.msg17152#msg17152

On 12 September 2023 you asked:
➽ if nobody votes, in your mind, what would be the outcome?
On 5 August 2024 you asked:
➽ What will not voting do?
Ignoring the previous attempt to discuss this, I will address your question at face value.
What not voting does is the opposite of what voting does.

𝟙 Non-voters will not be choosing evil.
𝟚 Non-voters  will not be choosing tyrants that tell goons with guns who to go threaten and hurt.
𝟛 Non-voters don't want government power used to force their beliefs on anybody else
𝟜 Non-voters know that if they voted the Ruling class uses that to claim the governed have consented to be governed.
𝟝 Non-voters know that the VOTARDS' imagined results caused by not voting are simple bullshit.
𝟞 Non-voters know the math shows the lie about how much difference your vote makes. 1 ÷ the number of voters is what percentage your vote counts.
𝟟 Non-voters know the math shows the truth that 70% of the voters did NOT vote for the winner
𝟠 Non-voters know the math shows the truth that 70% of the voters voted against the winner by not voting or

𝟙 I have observed many of the VOTARDS in this group arguing about how evil the other candidate is. They refuse to see the evil of their own candidate. They believe they are supporting the non-evil candidate. Both candidates are evil (a discussion of their evils is doable). So the reality is both sides are voting for the lessor of two evils. Which means both sides are voting for evil.

𝟚 Both sides believe they are choosing a leader. Leaders don't need goons with guns to threaten to hurt you if you don't obey, Nor do they need goons with guns to hurt you if you do not obey.  Both sides are choosing which tyrant they want ordering them about under Threat, Duress, or Coercion (TDC).

𝟛 Votards want government power used to force their beliefs on everybody else.

𝟜 Votards have never considered that consent without the option to not consent is not consent.

𝟝 Votards believe not voting will allow Warlords to take over. Got news for the Votards; The Warlords have already taken over. Others have totaled up the time of its existence that the Warlords have had the U.S. of A. involved in fighting wars.

𝟞 With 129,085,403 voters voting in the 2012 election, How much your vote mattered was 0.000,000,0077%. 1 ÷ the number of voters is how much your vote counted.

𝟟 With 218,959,000 eligible voters and only 129,085,403 voters voting; Only 0.59% actually voted. Of that 59% that voted only 65,915,795 voters voted for the winner. This means only 0.30% of the eligible voters voted for the winner. This clearly shows 70% of the eligible voters did NOT vote for the winner.

𝟠 With 218,959,000 eligible voters and 89,873,597 not voting, of the eligible voters 35% more non voters chose to not vote compared to the voters that voted for the winner.

Last upload November 2020:
https://synapticsparks.info/government/ExaminingVoting.html

Since your post just appeared before my eyes, I wish to share your previous discussion with me:
https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php...