Author Topic: GD  (Read 108 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dale Eastman

  • Owner of myself and this website
  • Administrator
  • Promiscuous Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,691
  • Reputation 0
  • This space for rent
    • Synaptic Sparks
GD
« on: October 27, 2020, 11:29:25 AM »
Quote
Voting for the lessor of two evils means
YOU SUPPORT EVIL
The lessor of two evils is... Still evil.
Quote
Whoever wrote this meme is deranged. It seems they are in some kind of hurry to embrace socialism. The lesser evil is to SLOW the spread of socialism. It is my greatest desire that this nation not be consumed by it until after I'm dead. Because there is no worse fate. Plenty of examples to draw from.
So Statism is Slavery has shite for brains for posting this garbage. Maybe they are socialists because they are promoting it with this garbage. It's like DON"T FIGHT SOCIALISM because it's still evil to resist. FU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote
Do I understand your point correctly?
Voting slows socialism?
What, specifically, do you mean by "socialism"?
Quote
The demonrats have moved so far left they ARE SOCIALISM. Funny, you're one of the few that would ever ask a question to clarify intentions. Remarkable.
Quote
Why thank you sir.
Will you be doing that clarification?
Quote
Oh please are we going to pretend we know the difference between classic socialism and the current definition? Are we going to pretend that we're scholars that have been studying the definition of socialism and the various kinds for decades? No, I don't want to play that game with you.
The demonrats are about control and taxes. Stealing your money so that they can redistribute to solve the world's problems all the while doing the CCP's dirty work which is infiltrating the US. I could write a book on this and the amount of corruption conducted by the demonrat party since Obomit first got elected. Hitlery should be in jail but the demonrat party had enough influence to get Comey in as FBI director to cover her tracks as she sold information for donations to their charitable trust.
So, let's see what sort of game you're playing with your next response, shall we? Put your cards on the table.
Quote
➽ Oh please are we going to pretend we know the difference between classic socialism and the current definition?

Ever hear of read Voltaire's Admonition?
Paraphrased: If you wish to communicate, define your terms.

What do YOU mean, specifically, when you use the word "socialism"?

Who, specifically, is the "we" you invoke?
Who, specifically, do you allege you speak for?

➽ Are we going to pretend that we're scholars that have been studying the definition of socialism and the various kinds for decades?

Who, specifically, is the "we" you invoke?
Who, specifically, do you allege you speak for?

I know it's not me. Because you don't know what I've spent the last decade studying.

➽ No, I don't want to play that game with you.

Translation: No, I don't want to tell you what I mean when I use certain words. If I do that, I can't equivocate.

➽ ⛔ ⛔ ⛔ ⛔ ⛔ ⛔ ⛔ ⛔ ⛔ ⛔

Statist bullshit ignored.

➽ So, let's see what sort of game you're playing with your next response, shall we?

What you call my game I call asking probative questions about beliefs and opinions posted by others. These questions are asked both for clarification (see how that loops back to the previous post) to deny equivocation, and Socratic Method to drill down to the truth behind the words.

➽ Put your cards on the table.

You're a statist with a religious, superstitious belief in government and its provably bogus authority.
It appears that you even V***.

I'm not and I don't.

Now about that socialism word you used, and what, specifically, you mean by it.
Put your cards on the table.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2020, 11:49:38 AM by Admin »
Natural Law Matters